<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Fovea Centralis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jasonporter.us/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jasonporter.us</link>
	<description>Tech Stuff by Porter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:02:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adventures with ZFS, Part 1 by Jon S</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2011/06/adventures-with-zfs-part-1/#comment-8819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonporter.us/?p=92#comment-8819</guid>
		<description>Still trying to solve a creeping CPU kernel issue ( I don&#039;t have a power consumption issue ) what I have is a slow growth in kernel CPU use in an idle systems that eventually will freeze a system in a few weeks (or cause a dtrace run of say &#039;hotkernel&#039; to freeze the system even earlier in about 20-30 hours).
The odd thing is I have the same MOBO X9SCA-F as you I have a E31270 CPU. &#160;I keep banging on the issue 148b, 151, 151a and even some new dev bits for acpica but I can not solve it. - Refer to illumos bug #1333
I am currious could you post the following (or E-mail it ot me)
uname -a
top -b &#124; head -15
rup `hostname`
&#160;
&#160;/usr/sbin/prtdiag &#124; head

	BIOS rev (at boot if known)
	&#160;

&#160;
&#160;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still trying to solve a creeping CPU kernel issue ( I don&#039;t have a power consumption issue ) what I have is a slow growth in kernel CPU use in an idle systems that eventually will freeze a system in a few weeks (or cause a dtrace run of say &#039;hotkernel&#039; to freeze the system even earlier in about 20-30 hours).<br />
The odd thing is I have the same MOBO X9SCA-F as you I have a E31270 CPU. &nbsp;I keep banging on the issue 148b, 151, 151a and even some new dev bits for acpica but I can not solve it. &#8211; Refer to illumos bug #1333<br />
I am currious could you post the following (or E-mail it ot me)<br />
uname -a<br />
top -b | head -15<br />
rup `hostname`<br />
&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;/usr/sbin/prtdiag | head</p>
<p>	BIOS rev (at boot if known)<br />
	&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adventures with ZFS, Part 1 by Porter</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2011/06/adventures-with-zfs-part-1/#comment-8491</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:53:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonporter.us/?p=92#comment-8491</guid>
		<description>After a few weeks of running, the benchmarks have improved slightly, which is interesting to me.  Sequential writes are up almost double to 497 MB/s, sequential reads are roughly the same at 529 MB/s.

I&#039;m very pleased so far, and still haven&#039;t implemented read caching.  With these performance numbers, a read cache may actually decrease performance on sequential reads, but should assist random reads somewhat, we&#039;ll see what happens in practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a few weeks of running, the benchmarks have improved slightly, which is interesting to me.  Sequential writes are up almost double to 497 MB/s, sequential reads are roughly the same at 529 MB/s.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very pleased so far, and still haven&#8217;t implemented read caching.  With these performance numbers, a read cache may actually decrease performance on sequential reads, but should assist random reads somewhat, we&#8217;ll see what happens in practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adventures with ZFS, Part 1 by Porter</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2011/06/adventures-with-zfs-part-1/#comment-8490</link>
		<dc:creator>Porter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 13:50:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonporter.us/?p=92#comment-8490</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon, I haven&#039;t noticed a power consumption issue but frankly I haven&#039;t been watching it that closely.  I will take a closer look and let you know if I see anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon, I haven&#8217;t noticed a power consumption issue but frankly I haven&#8217;t been watching it that closely.  I will take a closer look and let you know if I see anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Adventures with ZFS, Part 1 by Jon S</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2011/06/adventures-with-zfs-part-1/#comment-8426</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2011 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jasonporter.us/?p=92#comment-8426</guid>
		<description>Do you have a power managment issue on this system I am runnign 148b on a X9SCA&#160;and have a slow growing&#160;CPU usage across time on this system it appears to be related to settings in the /etc/power.conf file I am using the following - but it doesn&#039;t totaly solve my issues.
cpupm enable poll-mode
After a few days the system uses 12.5% (one hyperthreded core ?) of my CPU.
&#160;
Thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have a power managment issue on this system I am runnign 148b on a X9SCA&nbsp;and have a slow growing&nbsp;CPU usage across time on this system it appears to be related to settings in the /etc/power.conf file I am using the following &#8211; but it doesn&#039;t totaly solve my issues.<br />
cpupm enable poll-mode<br />
After a few days the system uses 12.5% (one hyperthreded core ?) of my CPU.<br />
&nbsp;<br />
Thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Porter&#8217;s Guide for Root and CyanogenMod on the Motorola Droid by tydy</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2010/06/porters-guide-for-root-and-cyanogenmod-on-the-motorola-droid/#comment-7100</link>
		<dc:creator>tydy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 04:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasonporter.us/?p=20#comment-7100</guid>
		<description>I really like this guide it was super useful!
But I really wanna chaneg my kernal.
I followed the directions and going to do the same one as you did.
should i wipe data and cache as well as backup my existing rom? is that necessary for this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like this guide it was super useful!<br />
But I really wanna chaneg my kernal.<br />
I followed the directions and going to do the same one as you did.<br />
should i wipe data and cache as well as backup my existing rom? is that necessary for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Check out the links, they&#8217;re growin&#8217;&#8230; by Matt</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2008/05/check-out-the-links-theyre-growin/#comment-1942</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasonporter.us/?p=3#comment-1942</guid>
		<description>Hey - you wouldn&#039;t happen to have the spec for the F13 sensor would you? I&#039;m hunting for it, but it seems to be hard to find :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey &#8211; you wouldn&#8217;t happen to have the spec for the F13 sensor would you? I&#8217;m hunting for it, but it seems to be hard to find <img src='http://jasonporter.us/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sigma SD14 Saturation Problem by Paul Edson</title>
		<link>http://jasonporter.us/2008/04/sigma-sd14-saturation-problem/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Edson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:37:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.jasonporter.us/?p=1#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Hello Jason, I saw your post after I recently encountered the same problem photographing red flowers in sunlight. ( Program mode/ISO 100/1.07 firmware.)  Using Lightroom and Sigma&#039;s PhotPro 3.2 for Mac, the photo&#039;s are unrecoverable.  MAcro shots under controlled light sources do not seem to exhibit the issue.   I&#039;m not sure if the camera sensor or firmware is the problem.  Like your camera, my is still under warranty.  Has Sigma made any effort to respond or correct?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jason, I saw your post after I recently encountered the same problem photographing red flowers in sunlight. ( Program mode/ISO 100/1.07 firmware.)  Using Lightroom and Sigma&#8217;s PhotPro 3.2 for Mac, the photo&#8217;s are unrecoverable.  MAcro shots under controlled light sources do not seem to exhibit the issue.   I&#8217;m not sure if the camera sensor or firmware is the problem.  Like your camera, my is still under warranty.  Has Sigma made any effort to respond or correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

